His immediate and unequivocal reaction was that it was a controlled demolition. The interview is in three parts on YouTube, in Dutch with English subtitles. Here is a link to the first part:. Excellent article, thank you.
And well done to all the architects and engineers who tirelessly helped realise this important scientific body of work. The findings from UAF are unimpeachable. A full copy of the report is available for free at the University website, where all professionals should see for themselves.
Hulsey et al, and all those at AE truth, are to be commended for their perseverance and bravery. WTC 7 was clearly visible behind her in the background. This has now been confirmed by University of Alaska Fairbanks. My compliments for this honest and factual reporting. Thank you. Please stand up to the upcoming requests to censor yourself speaking about reality in stead of some narrative pushed by those Powers that Should Not Be. Have a nice day. The collapse was only a controlled demolition.
No one under the logical science could believe the NIST theory. Surprise surprise….. Wouldnt be surprised if the WH tries to stop all that. All those people who lost their lives and some families are still in trauma, deserve to know how American Govt murdered its own people in cold blood. Be still, my heart! It is encouraging that a large newspaper has covered this story as it certainly lacks coverage practically every where else.
Clearly they know this is not true. I have followed AETruth. I feel they are on the correct track. Personally, I think it is important that we keep this a scientific discussion rather than get distracted on who, why and for what. NIST needs to be able to prove that the UAF study which is publicly available is not accurate or at least be able to make their modelling information public so that others can scrutinize their findings.
The evidence is clear and now we must get out the crayons and show the fact that you have exposed The real criminals. Time now for justice before they all die of old age.
Thank you for this long overdue story it demonstrates a truly honest approach to this remarkable coverup of facts by NIST. Well done. Steel framed buildings cannot collapse in free fall unless the strength has been completely removed below the falling section. Even Shyam Sunder lead investigator for NIST explained why that is impossible from fire in a press conference in August to launch the draft edition of their report into the collapse.
Looks like a demolition to me! This report just confirms what my eyes were telling me when the buildings came down. It was a controlled demolition and a false flag operation so the administration could pass the patriot act without any pushback from anyone and it worked perfectly. Even Senator Bob Graham of Florida has many questions concerning this physical impossibility but he has ben kept from stating his knowledge due to the possibility of prosecution.
I also wanted to add that in this world the physics would make this kind of free fall collapse impossible. In this day and age — during the information revolution — we should not have to wait twenty years for there to be mainstream discussion of the event from a scientific perspective. NIST, by abandoning science, has done the world a terrible disservice.
Those responsible deserve to be held in opprobrium. John Hort is on target. Neo-Cons Zakheim, Wolfowitz, et al participated in the study. Zakheim was Comptroller of the Pentagon budget. A missile hit the Pentagon destroying the section where the ONI was investigating the fraud. Owner Silverstein wanted to redevelop the WTC but faced billion dollar bills for asbestos fire-proofing removal. But the failure visibly began in the centre. Each fraud was covered up by another. A few thousand spectators, some may have videotaped it, a nice reward may tease out a few of these so we can compare the tapes.
Delivered coffee to Windows on the World restaurant , the elevator banks were two and three feet deep steel reenforced concrete , they would have been standing if a fire took down the buildings. The cleaning crews and bomb sniffing dogs were removed in the Summer of Too many unanswered questions , this was the Millitary Industrial Complex and the Corporate Masters of the Universe looking out for their interests.
Journalists are in the same situation. If you value your job, you better go along with what the government says. Thank you AET for being a voice of reason. Here is an explanation of their importance. They were in Afghanistan the month after. Please research what we are saying. God Bless. WTC 7. The collapse of this building, when viewed from most angles, does appear to resemble a demolition. Of particular concern is this building was not a towering inferno by any stretch of the imagination.
The UAF report raises some very important questions which must be answered thoroughly and precisely. There is much at stake here for two reasons. No individual or agency has ever been able to demonstrate the motions observed for both Building 7 and the twin towers, using a real world experiment. The NIST analysis and progressive collapse theory disagrees with experiment.
Rather it was brought down in a classic controlled demolition manner. And thanks very much to daily commercial news for printing this, very happy to see this. Their authority and expertise was considered to be the industry standard for all things quality. How disappointing that now they are just another compromised organization whose credibility is long gone. Judging by practically every comment here there are a lot of people due to be disappointed if they think anything should result from this, since the collapse of WTC7 was not a controlled demolition, but a structural collapse.
Hulsey, Gage, Walter, Korol, etc. That report should explain the cause and mechanics of the collapse in great detail. WTC 7, we knew, was built on a small number of large columns providing an open Atrium on the lower levels. Approximately three hours after that order was given, WTC 7 collapsed.
About people raised their hands. Thank you, to all of you for being so focused. Common sense says that random fires can not possibly bring a steel frame building down symmetrically at near free fall speed.
Thousands of dollars are being spent to prove the obvious and dozens of people are having to jump through hoops because of a criminal cover-up. Not many want to accept the fact that the high-rise architects and engineers know what they are doing, that fires generally will stay on the floor they started on.
Hopefully will be the year that this story from finally breaks. Thank you for reporting this. A refreshing bit of courageous journalism despite the nearly two decades conspiracy of silence.
Amidst our current global uncertainties, we must seek truth and integrity to ensure freedom and justice, it is the birthright of our humanity. There is so much proof that this is true. And yet we sit and except it as normal. What have we become? This may be a bit extreme, however, until the reasons can be validated as to how an object that is not in motion can have an amount of inertia to move in downward and outward at free fall, in a pyroclastic cloud of dust and the ejection of thousands of tons of steel sideways well over feet, that all building must come to an end and the subject of physics must be suspended.
I am ashamed of science in general as it has become a perverse form of modeling using false assumptions and reverse engineered outcomes that are not possible nor repeatable using what we used to know as the scientific method. Thank you for this. Yes, thank you for your fearless journalism!
The truth necessarily should set The People freaked! But free nonetheless. Thanks for publishing this! On September 11, , the world witnessed the total collapse of three large steel-framed high-rises.
Since then, scientists and engineers have been working to understand why and how these unprecedented structural failures occurred. If one of my students had written either of the NIST reports not only would I have failed them but I would also have had them thrown out of my programme for serious violation of research ethics both in fabrication and falsification of evidence together with failure to supply sufficient information for me to be able to reproduce their results which is an essential requirement for any scientific report.
There are two hypotheses on offer — Fire and Controlled Demolition. Dr Hulsey and his colleagues have demonstrated that it was not fire. Then after the building collapsed, where was the evidence of all the steel having been cut.
Cutting steel columns leaves the ends of columns cut and it would be obvious to any one of the hundreds of people on the site afterwards. Thank you for this article. Thank you for doing your jobs as journalists. The only respectable news website on the internet who has reported on this.
The ownership and those in charge of security at the WTC complex are the prime suspects. Why am I not surprised such fair coverage came from a Canadian institution rather than one from the US, with its misguided penchant to support Amnerican exceptionalism.
This is awesome news but the Sheople are still in passive mode, waiting to be told what to think or how to respond to a yet complicit mainstream media determined to keep them in the dark and under established, corporate control. They shame all of us. It should come with their jobs and commitment to science. But they are, alas, meek and afraid; to stand up to whom?
Team or Enterprise Premium FT. Pay based on use. Does my organisation subscribe? Group Subscription. Premium Digital access, plus: Convenient access for groups of users Integration with third party platforms and CRM systems Usage based pricing and volume discounts for multiple users Subscription management tools and usage reporting SAML-based single sign-on SSO Dedicated account and customer success teams.
Learn more and compare subscriptions content expands above. Full Terms and Conditions apply to all Subscriptions. Or, if you are already a subscriber Sign in. He sits at his desk, beyond massive twin doors that open and close at the touch of a button on his desk. Another button raises a hatch beyond his computer screen. She disappears and the hatch door lowers. My order arrives a few minutes later, as Silverstein is just starting to go into a seemingly planned soliloquy about how he developed his world-class taste for art and architecture.
At that point I was 49 years of age. I designed a building the purpose of which was to give the opportunity to produce a large amount of affordable space. The building was about 48 stories in height. Two million square feet of space. And as I built it, I fell in love with Carmen red granite as a facade material. It has this rich reddish quality to it with black elements. It was quarried in Finland and shipped to Italy where it was cut. The conclusion of it all was the building was covered in this stone.
Al Held paintings, for instance, have lots of color and context and are quite beautiful. I looked at them and thought they would bring intensity to the space. My wife concurred. I had a very big wall to fill: 20 feet by 15 feet in height.
0コメント