Also, create a list of your wants, needs, and desires for your camera, and see which camera ticks the boxes. XLR produces professional-grade sound. Can't stop your Blue Snowball from picking up the clicking of your keyboard? This can be a frustrating issue, especially if you're using it for streaming live. Luckily, there are a few easy solutions Skip to content Are you looking to buy a new camera and overwhelmed by choice? Related posts: SLT vs.
Bridge Camera: Which Is Better? Continue Reading. Getting even marginally better results using a dSLR or SLR requires a much more deliberate approach, stopping down just short of diffraction, careful setup of flash and reflectors, etc.
An advantage to using a dSLR and the best lenses you can afford might give you photos with less distortion than is shown in the sample photo of a computer motherboard you linked to.
That photo shows some distortion, altho' this may not be important for purposes of illustrating the products you're demonstrating. Oh, I beg to differ. You can practically touch your nose to the print and nor see ANY graininess. Since then I have moved on to a stable of Nikon gear, but the "Star" remains my fav.
BTW my Nikon Coolpix has given me some spectacular insect macros as well. It sounds like the OP is using a tripod and VR. If that's the case, it might explain some of his self-described "fussiness. Additionally, cranking the Aperture to 22 will degrade fine detail due to diffraction, and something more moderate, like ff13 might get closer to the results he's seeking.
I agree that the smaller sensor has some obvious advantages for macro, but I'm not convinced that a motherboard is a small enough target to create as great a difference as is being described. In my experience the biggest difference between a point-and-shoot and a DSLR is noise levels. Also, because of the auto-sharpening tendencies of point and shoot cameras, the pleasing, in-camera processed sharpness you see at small picture sizes can backfire on you when you make very large enlargements..
There are lots of other cameras that can do what it does and more, since its array of settable feataures is pretty limited but it has one HUGE asset, IMHO: the fact that you can carry it in a shirt pocket. This ends up being the camera I carry with me almost everywhere. The D60 is a good camera and you should be able to do lot of experiments with it in case you are interested in experimental photography. Good luck. I've taken a few pictures of products and the biggest difference with my Nikon D40 was the addition of the SB flash.
Once I bounced the flash off the ceiling it made an incredible difference. You might be able to simulate this with a simple white piece of paper or card stock, angling it in front of the flash so the light doesn't hit the product directly. You could try this on your point and shoot and your D The exposure will more then likely be off, but it might give you an idea. You may already have suitable lighting, in which case it won't make a difference, but if you are using your flash for any of these pictures, a bounced flash will make a big difference.
Remember to turn off VR when you're using a tripod. VR Might be the problem. I've allways had it on when shooting on the tripod. I'll test it out later. I seldom do not use a flash. I have bunch K compact florestents. A macro ring. I could definately improve my lighting. That was one of the deciding factors in puchasing the D I shoot all my work photo at ISO Here's a couple of shoot a cpu with my P at 10 megapixels. I think I could blow these up pretty big if I really wanted to and look good.
The D60 with it's stock lenses could not do as good unless it's the VR thing. I haven't pulled out my yet get to get details of the pins. Who makes 20 x 30 Prints? I sell used printers. The biggest I've come across is 17 x 19 inches. And you can't even buy 17 x 19 paper at Office Depot. Jerry, by no means should you give up on your dSLR. If nothing else, you'll enjoy it for other types of photography.
I prefer my Olympus digicam for ebay photos for this very reason. Unless I really need to set up more subtle lighting, I just put the item in a diffuser tent, point the lens through the zippered opening, and fire away.
Not worth it for casual product photos. It's a dirty little secret of digital photography that few folks are willing to admit to. Sometimes a tiny sensor digicam is the best tool for the job. BTW, noise is easy to fix using Noise Ninja or any of several comparable products. Those compact fluorescent type product light setups are handy but don't put out much light. Included in this guide: 1. Nikon Z5.
Specifications Type: Mirrorless. Megapixels: 24MP. Continuous shooting speed: 4. Viewfinder: EVF. Max video resolution: 4K UHD at 30p. User level: Enthusiast. Reasons to avoid - Only 4. Nikon Z fc. Megapixels: Monitor: 3. Continuous shooting speed: 11fps.
Viewfinder: EVF, 2. Nikon Z Reasons to avoid - No in-body stabilization - Still very few 'native' lenses. Nikon Z6 II. It may be an evolutionary upgrade of the original Z6, but it's still awesome. Continuous shooting speed: 14fps. Max video resolution: 4K UHD at 30p 60p via update.
Reasons to avoid - No articulating screen - 4K 60p video is cropped. Nikon Z7 II. Huge resolution, high-speed shooting and 4K video, but it's not perfect. Continuous shooting speed: 10fps. Reasons to avoid - EVF resolution lower than rivals - Tilt-angle display, not vari-angle.
Nikon D Lens mount: Nikon DX. Screen: 3in fixed, K dots. Continuous shooting speed: 5fps. Max video resolution: p. Reasons to avoid - Fixed screen not touch-sensitive.
Sensor: APS-C. Screen: 3. Viewfinder: Pentaprism. Max burst speed: 8fps. Max video resolution: 4K. Reasons to avoid - Less robust than the D - Downgraded autofocus system. Sensor: Full frame.
Lens mount: Nikon FX. Max video resolution: 4K UHD. Lens Mount: Nikon F. Screen type: 3. Max burst speed: 7fps.
User level: Professional. Reasons to avoid - Expensive. Nikon Coolpix W Specifications Type: Compact. Screen: 2. Viewfinder: None.
Lens: 3x zoom, mm equiv. Max burst speed:. User level: Beginner. Reasons to avoid - Small, low-res screen - Tiny sensor, low max sensitivity - Only 3x zoom.
Best for adventure lovers: the Nikon W can survive anything you can!
0コメント